초록
<P><B>Abstract</B></P> <P> <I>Agave tequilana</I> bagasse is the main solid waste of the tequila manufacturing and represents an environmental issue as well as a potential feedstock for biofuel production due to its lignocellulosic composition and abundance. In this contribution, this feedstock was subjected to pretreatments with HCl and H<SUB>2</SUB>SO<SUB>4</SUB> for sugar recovery and methane was produced from the hydrolysates in batch and sequencing batch reactors (AnSBR). Sugar recovery was optimized by using central composite designs at different levels of temperature, acid concentration and hydrolysis time. Results showed that at optimal conditions, the HCl pretreatment induced higher sugar recoveries than the H<SUB>2</SUB>SO<SUB>4</SUB> one, 0.39 <I>vs.</I> 0.26 g total sugars/g bagasse. Furthermore, the H<SUB>2</SUB>SO<SUB>4</SUB> hydrolysate contained higher concentrations of potential inhibitory compounds (furans and acetic acid). Subsequent anaerobic batch assays demonstrated that the HCl hydrolysate is a more suitable substrate for methane production; a four-fold increase was found. A second optimization by using HCl as acid catalyst and methane production as the response variable demonstrated that softer hydrolysis conditions are required to optimize methane production as compared to sugar recovery (1.8% HCl, 119 °C and 103min <I>vs.</I> 1.9% HCl, 130 °C and 133min). This softer conditions were used to feed an AnSBR for 110 days and evaluate its stability at three different cycle times (5, 3 and 2 days). Results showed stable reactor performances at cycle times of 5 and 3 days, obtaining the highest methane yield and production at 3 days, 0.28 NL CH<SUB>4</SUB>/g-COD and 1.04 NL CH<SUB>4</SUB>/d respectively. Operation at shorter cycle times is not advised due to microbial imbalance.</P> <P><B>Highlights</B></P> <P> <UL> <LI> Central composite design was employed to optimize sugar recovery and CH<SUB>4</SUB> production. </LI> <LI> HCl pretreatment outperformed the H<SUB>2</SUB>SO<SUB>4</SUB> one for sugar recovery and CH<SUB>4</SUB> production. </LI> <LI> Softer conditions were required for CH<SUB>4</SUB> optimization as compared to sugar recovery. </LI> <LI> AnSBR performance was stable during more than 90 days at cycle time of 5 and 3 days. </LI> <LI> Methane yields were close to the theoretical one for simple substrates as glucose. </LI> </UL> </P>