BioChem - DOS

Process and technoeconomic analysis of leading pretreatment technologies for lignocellulosic ethanol production using switchgrass

Bioresource technology : biomass, bioenergy, biowastes, conversion technologies, biotransformations, production technologies

Tao, Ling; Aden, Andy; Elander, Richard T.; Pallapolu, Venkata Ramesh; Lee, Y.Y.; Garlock, Rebecca J.; Balan, Venkatesh; Dale, Bruce E.; Kim, Youngmi; Mosier, Nathan S.; Ladisch, Michael R.; Falls, Matthew; Holtzapple, Mark T.; Sierra, Rocio; Shi, Jian; Ebrik, Mirvat A.; Redmond, Tim; Yang, Bin; Wyman, Charles E.; Hames, Bonnie; Thomas, Steve; Warner, Ryan E.

<P><B>Highlights</B></P><P>&#x025BA; Conceptual process design of switchgrass ethanol production process using six different pretreatment methods. &#x025BA; All costing and analysis data are compared in a consistent basis. &#x025BA; The impact of sugar and ethanol yields, capital investment, enzyme usages and other process variables are addressed. &#x025BA; The comparison of process performance and economics serves as an important part of the CAFI 3 efforts.</P> <P><B>Abstract</B></P><P>Six biomass pretreatment processes to convert switchgrass to fermentable sugars and ultimately to cellulosic ethanol are compared on a consistent basis in this technoeconomic analysis. The six pretreatment processes are ammonia fiber expansion (AFEX), dilute acid (DA), lime, liquid hot water (LHW), soaking in aqueous ammonia (SAA), and sulfur dioxide-impregnated steam explosion (SO<SUB>2</SUB>). Each pretreatment process is modeled in the framework of an existing biochemical design model so that systematic variations of process-related changes are consistently captured. The pretreatment area process design and simulation are based on the research data generated within the Biomass Refining Consortium for Applied Fundamentals and Innovation (CAFI) 3 project. Overall ethanol production, total capital investment, and minimum ethanol selling price (MESP) are reported along with selected sensitivity analysis. The results show limited differentiation between the projected economic performances of the pretreatment options, except for processes that exhibit significantly lower monomer sugar and resulting ethanol yields.</P>

2011

0960-8524

102

24

pp.11105-11114

10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.051

http://click.ndsl.kr/servlet/OpenAPIDetailView?keyValue=05787966&target=NART&cn=NART57906620

Pretreatment; Enzymatic hydrolysis; Biomass; Switchgrass; Process economics