BioChem - DOS

Comparative study on enzymatic digestibility of switchgrass varieties and harvests processed by leading pretreatment technologies

Bioresource technology : biomass, bioenergy, biowastes, conversion technologies, biotransformations, production technologies

Kim, Youngmi; Mosier, Nathan S.; Ladisch, Michael R.; Ramesh Pallapolu, V.; Lee, Y.Y.; Garlock, Rebecca; Balan, Venkatesh; Dale, Bruce E.; Donohoe, Bryon S.; Vinzant, Todd B.; Elander, Richard T.; Falls, Matthew; Sierra, Rocio; Holtzapple, Mark T.; Shi, Jian; Ebrik, Mirvat A.; Redmond, Tim; Yang, Bin; Wyman, Charles E.; Warner, Ryan E.

<P><B>Highlights</B></P><P>&#x025BA; We examine variability in switchgrass and its impact on pretreatment and hydrolysis. &#x025BA; We apply five different leading pretreatment technologies on common feedstocks. &#x025BA; Saccharification yield response is strongly correlated with harvest season of the switchgrass. &#x025BA; Eco/genotypes of switchgrass have less impact than harvest time on sugar yields. &#x025BA; Upland cultivars and over-wintered switchgrass may require more severe pretreatment conditions.</P> <P><B>Abstract</B></P><P>Feedstock quality of switchgrass for biofuel production depends on many factors such as morphological types, geographic origins, maturity, environmental and cultivation parameters, and storage. We report variability in compositions and enzymatic digestion efficiencies for three cultivars of switchgrass (Alamo, Dacotah and Shawnee), grown and harvested at different locations and seasons. Saccharification yields of switchgrass processed by different pretreatment technologies (AFEX, dilute sulfuric acid, liquid hot water, lime, and soaking in aqueous ammonia) are compared in regards to switchgrass genotypes and harvest seasons. Despite its higher cellulose content per dry mass, Dacotah switchgrass harvested after wintering consistently gave a lower saccharification yield than the other two varieties harvested in the fall. The recalcitrance of upland cultivars and over-wintered switchgrass may require more severe pretreatment conditions. We discuss the key features of different pretreatment technologies and differences in switchgrass cultivars and harvest seasons on hydrolysis performance for the applied pretreatment methods.</P>

2011

0960-8524

102

24

pp.11089-11096

10.1016/j.biortech.2011.06.054

http://click.ndsl.kr/servlet/OpenAPIDetailView?keyValue=05787966&target=NART&cn=NART57906618

Pretreatment; Switchgrass; Ethanol; Lignocellulose; Harvest season